Email TechnoMonk
Search Musings
Administration
Web Destinations
« Roto-Rooter & Recovery: Part I | Main | Occupy Wall Street West »

Insurance Rates


This note is to inform you that I will not be renewing my auto insurance policy with you, effective February 7, 2012.
 
The bill I recently received, for my six-month renewal, is $649.70. As I spent some time trying to wrap my head around this number, I did the math and discovered this is exactly 25% more than my previous bill. I did not understand at all how this could possibly be correct, so I called, and you indicated the rate increase was due to the fact that I had had a claim in 2010 and it (the consequences of the accident) had finally caught up with me. (Or words to that effect...)
 
Now, the claim I had in early 2010 (almost two full years ago!) was for a small fender-bender in my parking lot at work, and, yes, it was entirely my fault. However, my recollection is that this is the first claim I have ever had as a Farmers customer where the fault was mine. Yes, I have had comprehensive-coverage claims for cracked windshields and vandalized tires. And, yes, I once had a car totaled out, back in the 1980s, in the middle of the night (while I was upstairs in my house, sleeping) by a hit-and-run driver. BUT: I have not had an accident that was my fault since I’ve been insured by Farmers … and I started with you back in 1978.
 
Further, in all that time, I believe I have had only one moving violation: a speeding ticket in Lane County, Oregon, sometime in the late 1990s.
 
During our initial phone conversation about this rate increase, you offered to reduce my coverage limits so we could bring my premium payment into line with what it had been (up until now). At first, that seemed to be the way to go … but, really, I don’t WANT reduced coverage. I really desire some consideration as a long-standing Farmers customer, and to be assessed no penalty for having had one, yes one, accident in 34 years of continuous coverage (in Corvallis, Oregon; Bloomington, Indiana; Eugene, Oregon; Portland, Oregon; Roseburg, Oregon; and now, Larkspur, California).
 
But, after yet another consultation with you, Famers doesn’t seem to be able to offer me such consideration. I have now shopped around and AAA has written me a policy for the level of coverage I currently have with Farmers, for slightly less than I had paying with you. My new AAA policy is effective February 7 so you will not be receiving another premium payment from me for auto insurance. (My renter’s insurance will remain with Farmers, though I will be looking for other companies to ultimately fulfill that need as well.)
 
The question I leave you with is: am I not the kind of responsible person you WANT to be insuring?
 
Most respectfully yours,
TechnoMonk

Reader Comments (3)

Good for you!! Enough is enough...

If I owned an insurance company, you would be EXACTLY who I would want to insure. This is "gouging", plain and simple.
January 26, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterMike
After having coverage with Farmer's for 13 years, we got a letter one day saying they were cancelling our homeowner's insurance because our home "didn't meet their standards" . What??? I called my agent and he said they had someone out taking pictures or their insured properties and it looked like our house was abandoned. Coincidently, this was shortly after we had new siding put on the entire house and I had finished some major landscaping; we actually had a "Yard of the Month" sign in the yard from our homeowner's association! I assume they had taken photos of the wrong house but they were not willing to check or send a photographer out again. Bye-bye, Farmers.
January 26, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterKate Wilson
These guys are really something. Insurance companies, I mean. As long as you don't really NEED them, they are quite pleased to keep taking your money. THEN, once you actually submit a claim for what you're covered for in the first place: PUNISHMENT! Kate, yes, I still have my renter's insurance with them, and an agent told me one time that they actually do go out and view the physical structures they have insured. It's inexcusable that they wouldn't come out and take another look at yours once you pointed out an obvious error. Yuck!
January 26, 2012 | Registered CommenterTechnoMonk

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.