A Brief History of Jazzercise
I’m not really sure if you know what “Jazzercise” is. So, for the uninitiated: it’s a physical-fitness program started, back in 1969, by a woman named Judi Sheppard Missett. Who woulda thunk? … back in the Sixties while many of us were trying to find a way to extract this country from an illegal, immoral war, Judi was jazz-dancin’ away and founding a fitness movement. At the time, of course, I had no idea that that was going on. I was trying to stay in college, avoid the draft, protest the war, and basically stay alive.
My personal introduction to Jazzercise was in 1983 when my roommate at the time, Tom, was lured into class by his girlfriend. Then, one day in August, during a period when my life was not working on several levels, I decided to accept his invitation to join him in a class. (I had resisted the invitation for months.) And, once there, I was hooked.
These classes are what most folks know generically as “aerobics,” but Jazzercise is a unique, franchised and controlled entity. You can go almost anywhere, find a Jazzericse class, and know what you’re going to get. In a “regular” Jazzercise class, the entire hour set to music (from today’s pop to classic rock), you’ll experience a warmup portion, a heavier cardio segment, and then a cool-down period (which ends with the use of hand and/or leg weights and at least one or two routines done on a floor mat). The Jazzercise website describes itself as a “workout program, which offers a fusion of jazz dance, resistance training, Pilates, yoga, and kickboxing movements…[with such benefits as] increased cardiovascular endurance, strength, and flexibility, as well as an overall “feel good” factor. The international franchise business hosts a network of 7,300 instructors teaching more than 32,000 classes weekly in 32 countries.”
I was living in Corvallis, Oregon, at the time of my first class. Tom quickly drifted away about the time his relationship ended, but I continued on. Subsequently, I regularly attended classes in Bloomington, Indiana; Eugene, Oregon; and Portland, Oregon. (For most of the classes, most of the time, during all those years, I was typically the only male in the room.) Then finally, after almost 22 years of Jazzercising, in 2005, while living in Portland, I stopped attending class, mostly because of my increasing levels of chronic pain.
Honestly, I didn’t know if I’d ever be healthy enough again to pursue Jazzercise, or any fitness routine other than my daily walk.
Well, things have changed. During the last few months, I have gradually gotten healthier and stronger. I attribute much of this improvement to the work I’ve done with my Feldenkrais practitioner. In fact, at my last visit, given the progress I’ve made, she asked if I’d thought about joining a gym. I said, “no, but I have been seriously thinking about returning to Jazzercise classes again.”
I’m in a period right now of being pretty amazed with myself: I’ve attended Jazzercise class two Saturday mornings in a row. While I’ve been taking it very easy, wisely pacing myself, and enduring a recovery period each time: I seem to be making it OK. I can hardly believe the progress I’ve made.
The “feel-good factor” is real!
Flaunting the Law
On January 1 of this year, I posted an entry enthusiastically endorsing a new California law, slated to go into effect on July 1, making it illegal to drive while talking on a cell phone without a hands-free device (and would prohibit the behavior entirely for anyone under 18 years old). I said way to go California!
Well, folks, things haven’t exactly turned out like I imagined. For what I thought would happen was: people would actually obey the law.
HA! Oh, silly me!
Now, I haven’t seen any data, performed any studies, or done anything “scientific” in preparation for making this report, however, what I believe is: this law hasn’t changed shit.
People here are still driving while talking. And driving while texting. They’re endangering themselves and others to just about the same extent they were prior to July 1.
It pisses me off. I wish I could take down the license plate number of every car I’ve seen whose driver is flaunting this law. And, well: do something with it!
I am unable to do that, obviously. It would be a full-time job.
But, just so you know, I’m not doing nothing. Here’s the email exchange I had yesterday with the local police. (The “Twin Cities” referred to here are the towns of Larkspur and Corte Madera , California.)
Message Number 1 (TechnoMonk)
Greetings,
On Saturday, August 30, 2008, at app. 3:50 p.m., I was traveling west on Sir Francis Drake Blvd. from Hwy 101 to the Bon Air Shopping Center. I was following a Twin Cities police car, license plate #1225302. The driver of this vehicle weaved into the other lane about three times during the very short time I was following him. I believe that he was using a cell phone without a hands-free device.
Distressing. I thought we had a law.
Message Number 2 (Captain McDuffee)
Thank you for your email regarding the unsafe driving you witnessed. It doesn’t appear from your email that you actually observed the officer using a cellphone, is that correct? The unsafe driving may be the result of the officer using the Mobile Data Terminal in the patrol car.
In either case, I will speak to the officer about his driving. Once again, thank you for bringing this to my attention.
Message Number 3 (TechnoMonk)
Captain McDuffee,
Thanks for the quick reply.
It was, of course, the weaving that caught my eye.
At that time of day, going that direction, the sun was somewhat in my eyes. However, the driver’s head was tilted slightly to the right. His right arm was held to position his hand near his ear. I didn’t exactly see the cell phone, but it sure was a cell phone pose. The head, hand (and phone?) were in silhouette. I’d put my certainty level at about 90% that it was a cell phone.

